| Firm | Score |
|---|---|
| Osborne Clarke | 89.7 |
| Herbert Smith Freehills LLP | 89.1 |
| TLT LLP | 88.1 |
| Travers Smith LLP | 85.5 |
| Addleshaw Goddard | 85.3 |
| Irwin Mitchell LLP | 83.8 |
| Charles Russell Speechlys LLP | 83.6 |
| Mayer Brown International LLP | 83.3 |
| Hogan Lovells International LLP | 83.1 |
| Clifford Chance | 82.8 |
| Brabners LLP | 82.0 |
| CMS | 82.0 |
| Pinsent Masons LLP | 81.8 |
| Clyde & Co | 81.8 |
| Marriott Harrison LLP | 80.8 |
| Maples Teesdale LLP | 80.3 |
| Crown Prosecution Service | 80.3 |
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP | 80.2 |
| Dechert LLP | 80.0 |
| Trethowans LLP | 79.6 |
| Hill Dickinson LLP | 79.6 |
| Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP | 79.3 |
| Hugh James | 79.3 |
| Lewis Silkin LLP | 79.1 |
| Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP | 79.1 |
| Ashurst | 78.7 |
How would you rate the quality of work you are given?
Every trainee hopes to hit the ground running with interesting and challenging work when they begin their training contract. But someone has to do the routine tasks of indexing and bundling too. Whilst it goes without saying that a trainee who gives every piece of work their all is set up to succeed, a training contract should also offer plenty of varied, interesting and challenging work. This is key to your development as a lawyer and ensures that you are equipped with the necessary skills when you get to that coveted post-qualification stage. Trainees at these Lex 100 Winner firms were pleased to find that their experience involved exciting high-quality work amid the occasional unglamorous task. Click on a firm name to read their Lex 100 profile and see how they scored in other categories.