Firm | Score |
---|---|
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP | 90.0 |
Clifford Chance | 89.2 |
Osborne Clarke | 87.4 |
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP | 86.7 |
Milbank LLP | 83.9 |
Slaughter and May | 83.6 |
Travers Smith LLP | 83.6 |
Herbert Smith Freehills LLP | 83.2 |
Hogan Lovells International LLP | 83.1 |
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (UK) LLP | 82.8 |
Morrison and Foerster (UK) LLP | 82.4 |
Mayer Brown International LLP | 81.1 |
Crown Prosecution Service | 80.3 |
Goodwin Procter (UK) LLP | 80.3 |
TLT LLP | 80.1 |
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP | 80.1 |
Bristows LLP | 79.1 |
Weil, Gotshal & Manges (London) LLP | 78.8 |
Cooley (UK) LLP | 78.8 |
Vinson & Elkins RLLP | 78.1 |
Russell-Cooke Solicitors London | 77.4 |
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher | 77.4 |
Howes Percival LLP | 76.6 |
CMS | 76.4 |
Sidley Austin LLP | 76.2 |
How satisfied are you with your financial remuneration?
It’s not all about the money, but a good chunk of cash in your bank account does make for a nice sweetener at the end of a long month. Whilst earning a high salary shouldn’t be the main driver in your decision where to train, it will inevitably influence your decision. After all, you might be more willing to work your socks off for two years if you know there’s a six-figure NQ paycheque at the end of it. Likewise, you may be willing to settle for a slightly more modest sum to salvage some of your personal and social life. Trainees at these Lex 100 Winner firms feel that they are compensated adequately for their hard work. Click on a firm name to read their Lex 100 profile and see how they scored in other categories.